NOTE: BagNewsNotes is now located at Please update your bookmarks.

You will be automatically redirected in a few seconds...

« Nightline With The Sound Off | Main | The Games Of The (Tail End Of The) 43rd Presidency - #1: Hugger-'N-Slapper-In-Chief »

Aug 09, 2008

Olympic Notes: The More Things Change …


by contributer John Lucaites

What you are looking at are members of the Russian Olympic Woman’s basketball team just prior to an exhibition match against the United States in Hainilng, China.

The young women in the front with her hand on her chest and her eyes fixed above is Becky Hammon, a former All American at Colorado State University and currently a member of the top-ranked San Antonio Silver Stars of the WNBA.  She is also a native of South Dakota and, as of this past year, a naturalized citizen of Russia.  There has been something of a small controversy brewing here, as some such as U.S. basketball coach Anne Donovan, have accused her of being unpatriotic, but Hammon’s more numerous defenders have been quick to point out that there is nothing new about naturalized citizens playing in the Olympics, and the simple fact is that she was not originally invited to try out for Team USA and this was her one opportunity to participate in the Olympics.

And truth to tell, the look on her face as the Star Spangled Banner plays tells you what uniform she would much rather be wearing, and given the intensity of the gaze—in contrast to the bored and nonchalant indifference of her teammates—I doubt it is simply because it would give her a much better chance of winning a gold medal. This is not a picture of an unpatriotic U.S. citizen regardless of the uniform she is wearing.  Indeed, it displays the passionate love of country with a powerful and subtle nuance that reminds us of the tension between nationalism and individualism.

There is more to this picture, however, than the pained and conflicted loyalties of a single, individual athlete, however pronounced that might be.  For it also stands as a marker of the changes that have taken place in world of geopolitics over the past 30 years.  In the late 1970s the Cold War between the United States and Russia (then the USSR) was at full tilt and the tensions animated by ideological differences between western capitalism and Soviet style communism were no more evident than in the politics of the 1980 Winter and Summer Olympic games held respectively in Lake Placid, NY and Moscow, Russia.

The Winter Games came first, and the picture above stands in stark contrast to the most famous image to come for the Lake Placid games of a ragtag collection of U.S. college hockey players who “miraculously” defeated a Soviet team which, by almost any standard, consisted of seasoned and “professional” veterans.


The present day image comes from before the sporting event not after, and so it is marked by a degree of calm and reserve that we would not expect to find following an upset victory, but the larger point to be made is that the contemporary photograph would never have been taken in 1980 (and if taken surely not featured in the NYT), precisely because it would have been anathema to the spirit of the times—a Cold War world where national citizenship trumped all.

We have no doubt not yet moved fully into the “globalized” world that recognizes the legitimacy of post-national citizenship—and, indeed, we clearly continue to live in a country where at least one version of the cold war optic organized around the notion that walls of national separation and isolation might be a good thing persists— but that such a picture as the one of Hammon could even be taken and featured in a mainstream news outlet suggests at least the possibility of such transformation to a more complex and nuanced sense of citizenship on the worldwide stage.

But there is perhaps one additional point to be made as well.  For while we have a photograph from Lake Placid that helps to foreground the difference between a Cold War world and a post-Cold War world, there is no contrasting image to be found from the subsequent Summer games later that year in Moscow.  The reason, of course, is because the U.S. led a boycott of the Moscow games and no such pictures exist, period.  And the reason for that boycott:  in the summer of 1979 the Soviet Union had invaded …. Afghanistan. There are differences, to be sure, as we are tracking “terrorists” and not seeking to oppress “freedom fighters,” and yet, the more things change …

cross-posted from No Caption Needed

(image:  Elizabeth Dalziel/AP)


The USA is just as bad as Russian on all accounts... and quite frankly always has been.


Thanks for the shot of Becky Hammon. She hails from my alma mater. More power to her. Her expression leaves no confusion as to her geographic loyalties, and I am thrilled for her that she was able to play in these Olympics - no matter what team offered her the opportunity. You'd think the heavy duty jingoistic significance behind the east-west alliances of the games would have dissipated by now. Regrettably, there is an old guard unwilling to let go. Time will "fix" that problem. Human mortality isn't automatically a bad thing. Go, Becky!


How can you write this whole thing about how the "cold war is over" and NOT mention what's brewing in Georgia? The security council is working today on a resolution for the war there. They can't make up their minds and are split along classing cold-war era lines.

that should be "they are split along classic cold war era lines"

Well, Susan, at the least what is taking place in Georgia is hardly a "cold" war. And more, the Cold War was largely about the tension between western style capitalism and soviet style communism. And whatever you think of capitalism the simple fact is that soviet style communism and the direct threat it presumed to pose (and which animated at least half of the cold war) is no more. BUT also please don't lose sight of two other points: (a) the picture shows at least the possibility of a different way of imagining citizenship, and (b) there is an irony here also driven by the way in which western imperialism (e.g., our presence in Afghanistan) has replaced the hegemonic affronts of of the USSR.

To me this image, knowing that she is from the US, reminds me of how the war has our nation torn between two nations Gerogia and Russia.

Fair enough. Though one of the things it may point to is how images get interpreted in and against different contexts. When taken, and when I wrote the post above, the Russia/Georgia tension was not in the air -- at least it wasn't being talked about in the media nor was I particularly attentive to it (perhaps that in itself is a western problem worthy of more comment) -- and thus it directed attention to a different political register. Overload the front pages with pictures of the devastation, promote a lame duck President complaining about the excessive use of force, and of course it begins to signify in somewhat different terms. I still think that for all of that the image identifies possibilities and one is of a future in which citizenship is not driven by the emphasis on exclusionary nationalistic sentiments. "Possibility," of course, is an elusive term -- some might say it is a 'weasel word' -- but it nevertheless shows us what a different configuration might look like ... and if we can imagine it maybe we can make it. No guarantees of course, and possibility is not likelihood ... but without the possibility ...

Playing for Russia is simply not cool. Have SOME pride rather than desperation. amateurs are purely in it for ourselves,luv(?)

(of course, it's thems wha' gives us professionals a bad name)

@John Lucaites. It is her pride that got her there, so what if she is on Russia's side?

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

My Other Accounts

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 07/2003